A lawyer who was wrongly accused of influencing MPs and peers China She lost her legal battle against MI5, who she said nearly three years ago was trying to interfere with the British democratic process.
The court’s investigative powers through the spy agency had been legitimate when it issued a “monitoring intervention” in January 2022 on lawyer Christine Lee, who was accused of “knowingly working to intervene in political activities” for Beijing.
Mr. Justice Singh, sitting with Mr. Boyd and Judge Rupert Jones, unanimously dismissed the petition by Lee and Daniel Wilkes, his son, against MI5in governing what was partly in secret.
Lee is a lawyer who has been active in promoting Anglo-Chinese relations. She was once out of the prize Teresa May when he was prime minister – and had donated £584,177 to the office of Labor MP Barry Gardiner.
The tribunal, chaired by Singh, concluded in an open public hearing that it was sufficient that MI5 had “rational reasons” for national security concerns about Lee – but did not specify what those concerns were for reasons of official secrecy.
Post Newsletter promotion
The cases, the judges added, were separate in the closed ruling, but they argued that the “national security assessment” was justified by the spy agency – and should have been announced to MPs and peers almost three years ago. .
At the time, MI5 said Lee was acting as part of the United Labor Department of the Chinese Communist Party – and the UFWD was “covertly trying to interfere in UK politics”, in part by cultivating “relationships with influential figures”.
Lee, who denies being a Chinese agent, has previously argued that the vigilantes’ exit “served a political purpose, namely to serve the interests of the conservative party.”
The case about the alleged improper Chinese influence was made in less than a week. Last week it emerged that Yang Tengbo, an Anglo-Chinese businessman who had been associated with Prince Andrew, was banned from the UK in 2023 because he was believed to be acting as a proxy for Beijing and the UFWD.
Yang lost an appeal against his expulsion last week and on Monday denied his right to anonymity. “The widespread description of me as a spy is completely false,” Yang said in a statement.
Wilkes had been employed by Gardiner between 2017 and January 2022, when he lost his job as an MP, on the same day an impeachment attempt was made against Lee.
That investigator said Gardiner gave him an ultimatum to resign or be fired after MI5 briefed the MP on the deadline. Gardiner denies this, the court said, but the MP released the statement at a time when Wilkes had a break.
Wilkes brought an allegation against him as significant as a violation of his human rights. “He had lost contact with his friends” and “he fears his future employers will hesitate to hire him” because of his association with his mother, the court noted.
The court ruled that Wilkes’ right to privacy and family life under Article 8 of the European Convention had not been violated. The judges noted that MI5 did not mention that he was on the train and did not terminate his role as a spy agent with Gardiner.
The court held that Lee’s human rights were also violated during the incident. “The state in the protection of the security of the country will outweigh the obstacle C1” [Lee’s] the right to observe private life,” it is said.