Drive was published in 2011, but fans only realize that there may be a double meaning behind the title, and many of them have shared their theories
Ryan Gosling’s movie “Drive” has led to the debate on the meaning behind its title, and some spectators said they think it actually has a double meaning. One Reddder I thought they had cracked it when they took to the “true movie” forum for a discussion about what other people thought about the movie, saying they thought he had a lot of “symbolism” during.
They wrote: “I have always heard that Drive was a underestimated movie, but this is just my personal opinion. I have seen it recently and noticed some very interesting aspect for the story of the movie and, in the hope, you can share -some you have found.
“First of all, the main character, is never called the whole movie. It is only the driver. Now, this is quite evident if you have seen the movie, but this is deeper.
“The driver never tells anyone his name so he cannot feel the fault for his actions. It is not he who did it, he is the one who projects himself, the driver, who did it. I found it very interesting and also play in my next point (good follow), contrast.
“Throughout the movie, the mood was a bit strange. If you don’t understand what this is, please Google is difficult to really explain.
“The outside driver looks like a sweet and kind man who has just dumped as a wheel to make money.
“However, it is obvious that he is struggling with the inner demons and, when they” go out “, makes it an incredible movie, even if it is hyper-violent. This really mixes the concepts of good and bad and deform our perception of the driver.”
In the comments, someone wrote: “I think the driver is like any other human beings, although anything that is the mystery is that he painted darker and in his introverted ways we do not know. Fantastic things.”
Another said, “I also finished this movie literally. My main” problem “was that for a movie called Drive … they did not do much driving.
“There is nothing wrong with it, but it seems to me that a few really” fantastic “driving scenes would really have added to the movie. I think the movie is a great opinion of modern Noir. I think the soundtrack is amazing. I really liked the movie. But is it too much to ask for a little driving?
“I feel that action movies have a badly wrapped in being” anti -intellectual. “
According to culture, the movie’s name really has a double meaning.
They write: “The title is quite simple at the beginning, as driving is a central motif of the story. With the driver of Gosling who works as a escape driver, it is easy to imagine that he feels the” Drive! “Pretty often, too.
“The movie also examines a person’s driving; what requires them, why they make the decisions they make, why do they make mistakes?”
They point out that “Gosling’s character carries a scorpion jacket everywhere, in reference to the scorpion and the frog crossing the lake”, and the “Scorpion bites the frog and both die” because it is in the “nature” of the scorpion.
They said that it is “deliberately going” if the Gosling character is the “scorpion here, Picot and Self-Saboto due to his own unity, or if the frog is marked by a scorpion and is doomed to be chopped.”