Stewart said that the Trump administration has such a “angry” response to the evaluation of United States intelligence if it is so confident in the attack.
Jon Stewart wonders why the Trump administration has such a hard response to an international north -American intelligence assessment that claims that the America’s attack on Iran on Saturday did not “forget” nuclear places, In spite of what the President has stated.
In a podcast on Thursday, The television personality raised the question: If Trump’s administration is confident that the attacks “completely destroy” Iran, why they react in this way? “It should not be so difficult not to be so defensive and angry all the time,” Stewart said.
Stewart continued to call White House Officials like Karoline Leavitt who felt the need to attack journalists who had questions about the evaluation of intelligence.
Read -Ne More: Health worries are soaked while Trump is on the stairs to Air ForceRead -Ne More: Lip reader reveals brutal 6 -letter gossip by world leaders on Trump at NATO summit
“The Secretary of the Press Karoline Leavitt goes out, and they ask,” Did he forget? “And she says,” Everyone knows what happens when you have a precision strike with this type of weapon, “he said.
“These weapons have never been used before in the history of the planet. But everyone knows what happened,” he added.
“It is beyond nonsense. And if anyone goes back, they demand 100 percent shit and anything beyond that this leaves anger and frustration due to fragility.”
The Trump Administration has been tearing up any media report contradicting the President’s claims that US strikes demolished key nuclear places in Iran, as Trump insisted that the places were “completely destroyed” and “oblivion” of social truth.
“Whether this is CNN, MSNBC or The New York Times news, there have been coverage of a preliminary assessment,” Pete Hegseth said at the Pentagon press conference that defended the country’s strikes in Iran.
“It was preliminary, a day and a half after the real strike, when it is written in writing that it requires weeks to accumulate the data needed to make this evaluation,” he continued.
“There is low confidence in this particular report,” he added.
The head of the Department of Defense added that the report was made by “someone had an agenda to try to angry the waters and make it look like this historical strike was not successful.”
For all the latest news directly on your inbox, sign up -Free newsletters here.
“I hope, with all the ink spilled, all your sales points find the time to properly recognize this historical change of continental security that other presidents tried, other presidents spoke,” said Hegseth. “President Trump succeeded. It is a lot of.”
To get the latest local news and features in Irish America, visit our main page here.