The Trump Administration has to return control over California military troops This is deployed at Los Angeles Protests The return of civil servants, the Federal judge ruled on Thursday.
The decision sets potential supervision over destiny Approximately 4,000 guards The White House was eavesdropped to respond to continuous unrest.
“[President Trump]The actions were illegal – both exceeded the scope of its statutory body and violate the tenth amendment in the United States Constitution, “written by Judge Charles R. Breyer on Thursday night Judgment, Referring to the amendment to preserve certain powers of states from the federal interference.
“Therefore, he must return control of the National Guard in California Governor of the State of California immediately,” the judge wrote.
The court’s order, which Trump administration immediately appealed, was set into force on Noon on Friday.
The decision also temporarily deals with federal officials to distribute the national guard in the meantime.
California officials, who opposed Trump’s arrangement of guard, celebrated the verdict.
“The Court just confirmed what we all know – the military belongs to the battlefield, not in our city streets,” Gavin Governor wrote In the statement of X. “This victory is not only for California, but a nation. It is a check for a man whose authoritarian tendencies increase until the day.”
The Trump Administration immediately complained about the decision on the ninth appellate court in the circle.
Independent He was looking for a comment from the White House and the Department of Justice.
Working Group 51 leadership, which coordinates federal troops in LA, delayed in the Office of the Secretary of Defense when he requested a comment. The Defense Department announced not to comment on the permanent litigation as a policy.
In his judgment, Judge Breyer found that the Trump administration did not meet the federal requirements or follow the appropriate procedure for international guard in California, a step of federal law, such as rebelles or overall federal authorities.
“Protests in Los Angeles fall far short” rebellions “,”, noting the judge, noting that the protests do not form a government-feeding, and immigration officers continued to be able to arrest the arrest.
The decision came after the administration and state Squared Off earlier in court as part of California The lawsuit causes the presidential decision from last week to federate troops Despite the opposition of state and local officials.
During the hearing, a lawyer for California He warned that Trump administration, take control of guard, tried “dangerous expansion of the executive”.
“They say that the President can arrange the FIAT National Garda,” Lawyer Nicholas Green allegedly said.
California claimed allocation, which swelled to include about 4,000 military troops – about half already in the city – and 700 Marines, violated Federal Law On topic, which describes the presidents by giving orders to state branches of the State Guard “through governors.”
Trump administration, for its part, claimed that the president was rightly used by his powers as the main commander of the armed forces, and that the National Careburst order was legally even without reference to the Federal Law.
Lawyer of Justice Brett Shumate allegedly On Thursday he told the court that pause or confiscation of the decision of the White House on the National Guard was “outstanding” and an inappropriate step for the Federal Court.
“It would have reversed the Military Judgment of the President,” Shumate said. “That would put federal officers and property at risk.”
The Management Board also claimed that it said the orders of the civil servant responsible for the guard, despite the ordering of deployment without the consent of the news.
The Judge Breyer often appeared skeptical at the position of Trump administration during the hearing, pushing himself to his claims that courts have no power to strive for legal and factual bases for sending to troops.
In various points, the judge waved a pocket constitution in participants in the case, and suggested political leaders by making decisions without checks and the balance of Kings against which 13 colonies were revolved to form the United States.
“It is the difference between the Constitutional government and King George” Breyer told. “It’s not that a leader can just say something and it becomes.”