The Federal Judge ruled on Wednesday that the Trump administration violated its previous order on its attempts to deport migrants to Libya, despite the fact that none of the individuals in question were from this country
A federal judge at Massachusetts Wednesday ruled that the Trump administration “Undoubtedly” raped a previous court order when it was deported eight immigrants From several countries to South Sudan in the early hours of Tuesday morning.
The Judge of the North -American District Court, Brian Murphy, said that during the hearing, the Trump administration did not comply with his ruling in March that he ordered that he did not sport immigrants to a country other than his own without being able to challenge his withdrawal to court.
Judge Murphy’s ruling comes after the previous reports of people from Myanmar, Laos, Vietnam, Cuba, Mexico and South Sudan sent to South Sudan were confirmed by the National Security Department Wednesday morning. According to the DHS, the eight people sent to the war -torn country had, according to DHS, violent criminal stories, including allegations of murder and sexual assault.
Read -Ne More: Bill Gates names three well -paid jobs that are safe from the AIRead -Ne More: Bruce Springsteen Words Message for Trump after being called “Drying”
“The actions of the department,” Murphy said, “they are indisputably raped of the order of this court.”
Government lawyers said in court that migrants are still in the custody of United States immigration and customs execution (ICE) and confirmed that the plane had landed, but refused to share its final destination.
According to travel advice from the State Department, Americans should not travel to South Sudan “due to crime, abduction and armed conflict” and states that in March, the Department “ordered the departure of U.S. government employees from non-emergency southern Sudan.”
Murphy publicly exposed the sequence of events that caused migrants to be sent to South Sudan after 30 minutes of sealed procedures during Wednesday. He said that the individuals were notified of their final destination “sometime in the evening” on Monday, outside of commercial hours. Added that they left the ice installation Texas The next morning, as last time at 10 am and sooner than 9 am
The judge said that individuals could not have had enough time to consult with a lawyer or family members, saying that it was “impossible” for those individuals “to have a significant opportunity to oppose” their deportation to a third country.
The audience comes after immigration lawyers told Murphy on Tuesday that at least two of their customers, by Myanmar and Vietnam, were allegedly deported on Tuesday morning to South Sudan.
According to one of the lawyers of the people, his client, Nyo Mint, may have been deported to his country of origin in Burma. However, he told NBC News that he is still in the dark on where his client is right now and says he has been “missing”.
“I have not heard of my client,” said lawyer Jonathan Ryan. “How should I take his word that was sent to Burma?”
Ryan said to the departure that the government acts as if the due process was a privilege, saying that it is a problem “when we stop doing a process due to unpopular people.”
During a DHS press session on Wednesday, spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said of migrants: “No country on Earth wanted to accept them because their crimes were so unique barbarians.”
He also pointed out in the judicial system by his orders against the administration.
“Activist judges are on the other side, struggling to return them to the ground of the United States,” he said.
The court order that Murphy claims that the violated administration was issued earlier this month by Murphy himself. He blocked the Trump administration’s efforts to deport individuals from countries such as the Philippines, Vietnam and Laos to Libya. Murphy then reaffirmed his sentence on the deportations of the Third Country in response to an emergency motion for migrants’ lawyers.
According to his order, the judge said that immigrants need to be warned and the possibility of considering concern about possible torture or persecution.
The Trump administration challenge of the Murphy Order opens a process of criminal contempt, although the judge does not yet have to govern or indicate if he plans to pursue this option.