The first 100 days of Trump have been affected by the controversy of the reduced executive orders, to their fare policy that increases the global economy
During a Exclusive interview with ABC News’ Terry Moran this Tuesday, President Donald Trump Had a shocking response to Moran when asked if he thought he was too authoritative During their first 100 days in office.
“What do you say to people who are worried that you take, taking too much power and turning as a authoritarian president as we had not had before?” Moran asked.
“No, I would hate them to think -“, to Said Trump visibly challenging. “I’m doing one thing: I’m doing America again.
Read -Ne More: Melania Trump shows true colors with a three -word command to Donald during Pope funeralRead -Ne More: Donald Trump marked “disgusting” while honor Pope Francis in a “bewildering” manner
“The election was equipped. It should have ever been. Our country suffered a lot, and now our country is back as no one can believe. Today I have publishers where they say they have never seen anything.
Trump has repeatedly defended his push for the limits of presidential power, saying that it is a necessary step to heal a “sick” country.
During his first 100 days back to the White House, Trump has published several controversial and possibly unconstitutional executive orders, including his attempt to end the citizens of the birth part, a case that is now in front of the Supreme Court.
Dozens of Trump’s executive orders have been affected by court by federal judges throughout the political spectrum, and many experts have asked if the administration complies with these court orders. In the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, Maryland’s man was mistakenly deported to a MEGA Salvadore prison, the judge who oversees the case has several times the lawsuits of the Department of Justice have dropped for dragging himself to fulfill his order to “facilitate” his return to the United States, an order that was affected by the Supreme Court 9-0.
Trump administration officials have been behind, arguing that it corresponds to El Salvador, although the President of El Salvador also said that he does not have the power to return abrego Garcia. The administration has also argued that the information on the steps you have taken or can take to return to ABREGO GARCIA is protected by the laws of the privilege of law, the secret laws of the State, the “privilege of government” or other rules of secrecy.
But Judge Paula Xinis said that these claims, without any fact, reflected a “voluntary refusal and bad faith to fulfill the obligations of discovery”.
“For weeks, the defendants have sought refuge behind the vague privilege claims, not shown, using -as a shield to obstruct the discovery and evade compliance with the orders of this court,” Chinese wrote on Tuesday. “The defendants have learned, at least since last week, that this court requires legal shows and in fact to support any privilege claim. However, they have continued to rely on the statements of the boiler plate. This ends now.”