Trump says supreme court limiting judges’ powers is ‘monumental victory’ as liberal justice issues scathing dissent – live | US supreme court


Supreme Court of Nationwide in log a “Travesty for the rule of law,” said generous justice

Here’s more of a liberal justice disagrees 5 Trump House, Inc..

Talked about the bench-liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor Called the Supreme Court’s Majority Will “A Travesty to rule the law” and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Delivered the loves to disagree with the scripture

The court’s plan permit an executive to the constitution And as much as someone who does not act There is an risk for a threat to rule the law. Given the critical role of judiciary in maintaining rule of the law … is odd, to say the least, as the court would Dona Executive’s want to be delivered by the constraints of the law By prohibiting an area of ​​the hall by an arrangement complete compliance with the constitution. “

Conservative Amy Casey Barrett Traditional, especially sharp and argued in Jackson in the major opinion of writing

We are not residents in the justice Jackson’s argument, which is the odds with more than two centuries “is worth mentioning in the constitution itself. “

Set

Updated at

The key is at least

Tuber He says he believes Spain I arrived in the birthday commitment for sharing the nations to spending 5% in a general defense.

Spain is unwilling to make her grade funding that was It costs over to the Summit The Haga before this week.

Set

Updated at



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *