Labour MPs ready to rebel against welfare reforms despite deselection threat


Labor The rebels said they would refuse to support Sir Keir Starmer Plans To reduce disability – despite receivables, they can face a decision if they vote against reforms.

Independent It was said that MPS – including ministers – Review of rebellion against the government Welfare reforms On Tuesday next week, they threatened the loss of the whip, and even, according to two sources, decisions.

The question came to the head in a fire meeting Parliamentary Party for Work Referred to the Secretary of Labor and Pension Liz Kendall on Monday night with several MPS privately claiming that he could end with Sir Keir who was performed as a leader.

The rebellion became official shortly after the amendment to the welfare reform account, calling a break in reforms next week, which some probably could sign as many as 100 representatives.

Starmer and Chancellor Rachel Reeves must balance books

Starmer and Chancellor Rachel Reeves must balance books (Getty)

The government plans to earn $ 5 billion savings on well-being mainly by reducing personal independence (PIPS) for those with disabilities by restricting access for all but disabled.

Earlier, at least 80 representatives, including 12 ministers, was understood to consider the rebellion against legislation required to reduce the benefit account for 5 billion pounds per year. But a new amendment, which is meant to hold him for the SELECT COMCEL SELECT MEG HILLIER and other chairs, can support more.

One Senior MP told independent: “Sharks circle around the prime minister.”

Others complained that the “Government did not listen to private problems.”

Toward GuardianAmendments are expected to note that estimates suggest 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, can be pushed into poverty.

Ms. Kendall told a private meeting of the work of the work that there was a “no path to social justice based on greater utility that spends alone”, but its appeal is described as a “cloth”.

Lady Me Hillier

Lady Me Hillier (Well Media)

The Cabinet Minister said, “Our plans are rooted in fairness, for those who need support and taxpayers.

“They are to ensure that the state of well-being survived, so there is always a security network for those who need. They do appropriate protective measures to protect the most vulnerable.

“But above all are about our belief that everyone can fulfill their potential and live hopes and dreams when – we collectively provide them with real possibilities and support. This is a better future that we strive to build for our voters and our country.”

In the meantime, they are considered stronger measures to stop the rebellion. According to sources, ministers and other representatives were warned, they could face a decision if they resign and vote against the government. Downing Street denied it, with the source, saying, “This is not how we do business.”

But the number of others has been warned that they can face the same consequences of the former chancellor of John McDonnel, Zare Sultan and others who lost the whip after rebellion into the children’s drive.

Last week Deputy Government Angela Rayner He refused to exclude penalties for those planned for rebellions against the government.

Meanwhile, it is understood that MPs ask for permission to miss voting are denied because the government wants the look of loyalty to the second reading of the votes 1. July.

Secretary for work and pensions Liz Kendall

Secretary for work and pensions Liz Kendall (So wire)

At the PlP meeting on Monday night, only a week before the voice, Ms. Kendall will try to persuade the Command Representatives of the MP that the government has no choice but to balance books.

But the former Jeremy Corbyn Ally Richard Burgon announced that he would represent a petition that requires a wealth tax instead of uses reduced next week only 24 hours before key voting.

Publishing on x (earlier Twitter), he said, “Now confirmed: Vote of Disability reduction It will be next week.

“So next Monday in parliament I will introduce my petition for Wealth tax – No Disability reduction.

“Over 70,000 have already signed! Let’s get as much as possible.”

The question became tension in the review of the past months until the past month when the MS Rayner MS Rayer leaked also proposed eight new riches in the richest individuals and large corporations as an alternative to reduction.

The order was played during the issue of work and pensions in Commons with a representative that suggest that the advantages of the benefits will lead to “awful poverty”.

The workpeliver andy McDonald requested further evidence of how many people will lose on personal pay independence as a result of the welfare reform account.

Mr. McDonald, Middlesbrough and Thornaby East, said “Ministers who are expected to lose payments make up one in 10 of the total number of Pipka cases, but this will still lose £ 1,400 on average.

“But these numbers are based on the set of assumptions that the person described as very uncertain. DWP data show that there are 1.3 million people who are not currently not to meet new criteria.

“So before the representative is asked to vote on the emergence of such awful poverty, will DWP or UPs provide further evidence submitted by these claims?”

In Commons, he also signed that any support for reforms for disposal benefits from persons with disabilities who need help “to cut food, wash and go to the toilet”.

Work and pensions Minister Sir Stephen Timms said the reforms will “open opportunities for people who have been rejected possibly, far away”.

It comes after Vicky Foxcroft resigned as a government whip over the suggested cuts last week.

Last week, Mr. Keir clearly said that he would not provide more concessions for the rebels that have already provided an additional clarification for those who are applying for PIPS.

He said, “Well, we have to go through that and I was clear about it from the beginning to the end. It doesn’t work for those who need support.” All he needs reforms, and that’s what we intend to do. “

Asked about the potential rebellion, he replied, “Principles remain the same, those who can work should do. Those who need support to work should have that support in business, for which you don’t think they don’t think at work.

“Those who will never be able to work should be properly supported and protected. And that does not include review and review. So they are the principles, we need to do the reform, and we will continue with that reform when it comes to the account.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *