A controversial account that has been on New Zealand‘S The biggest practice Maori protest He was hardly defeated in parliament in the middle of fear, that would erode indigenous rights.
The Principles of the Bill Contract He died in his second reading with 112 votes for 11. to 11. year, a crushing defeat widely expected.
Politicians on the floor in the gallery Breached into songs or poemAs they celebrated as Gerry Brownlee speaker tried to maintain control, it is even removed by a man from the gallery.
The proposed law sought to redefine the conditions for the founder of the nation between the Māori and British crown tribe signed 180 years ago.
Bill got wide attention after video The youngest nation legislation that narrows a copy of the proposed legislation And the leading dance of the hack in parliament went a virus.
Massive protests against the law with a chicken on the tense of thousands New Zealanders gather out of parliament 19. November.
“This account was not stopped, this account was absolutely destroyed”, Hana-Rāwihti Maipi-Clarke, the Maori A member who led Haku during the first reading of the law in November, he said.
“We had two choices: to live or die. We decided to live.”

Bill suggested Law on Right Right To define the principles of Waitangi contracts from 1840. years New ZealandFounder document to support Mair’s rights. The contract promised that the tribes of wide rights retain their countries and protect their interests in return to twist in the British.
The bill is intended for the replacement of the principles created by courts and parliament for conducting the relationship between the crown and the maorine of the tribe with a new set of rules.
The leader of the Acts David Seymour said the account is “opportunity for parliament, not courts, and not to the courts, to define the principles of the contract, including the establishment that each person is equal to the law.”
The party claimed that the current principles were wrongly presented the original intention of the contract from 1840. year, creating a two-layer system in which Maori had different political and legal rights in relation to non-Maori.
The legal parties were the only members who voted in favor of the law on Thursday.

Mr. Seymour vowed to continue the fight. “I believe that this account or something will go one day because there are no good arguments against his facilities,” he said at the social media.
Former Prime Minister and Labor Chris Hipkins called Bepac Mr Seymour “stain for this country” and called the ruling coalition for the help “wider myth in the Maori Privilege.
He said “Grubby little account was born from a rough little job”.
“What is the most important is the way the law and political right is bleeding at the narrative to meet the racist agenda,” said Willie Jackson, Lider Lady Maori Caucus.
“It has always been on legal rights, māori have a crown contract.”

The defeat of the law was widely expected because they did not support other members of the Management Coalition and also faced the opposition of opposition parties.
The draft law received an irresistible 300,000 answers when it was open for applications early this year, and most oppose the proposal.
Then the parliamentary committee recommended that the account did not continue after receiving 90 percent of the submission by opposing it.

Christopher luxon, The Prime Minister was not in parliament to another reading of the law. He agreed to support him under political work with Mr. Seymour who gave him the power to lead the coalition government. However, he said there was nothing in the account he liked.
Finding oneself without enough management after election 2023. year, Mr. Luxon negotiated two smaller parties, including Mr. Seymour, in turn for political concessions.
The Minister of National Prophets and Maori-Crown of Tama Potaka called the “Cremation Day” for an account. “He’s dead, he’s gone and he’ll be buried,” he said on Thursday for RNZ.