A Plastic surgeon He was found guilty of attempting to murder a colleague of the doctor he wanted “from the way,” to broke into his home, who put the ground floor in gasoline, then stabbed his victim.
The jurors were thinking more than 12 hours on Leicester Crown Court, before the finding of Peter Brooks, 61, guilty of the Graema Perketa and the ground floor with gasoline with intent to ignite him.
It can now apply that Brooks is “voluntarily absent” from his monthly trial because he was a hunger strike and said “would rather be dead than closed.”
He also fired his lawyers before the trial and was ineffective in that case.
The consultant, specializing in burns and plastic, was convicted on Monday two points of attempted murder – one for the intended use of fire, and the other for the sting – attempted to intend to live life and own a knife in a public place.
The court heard that moving on the snow conditions in Hall, near Southwell, Nottinghamshire, in the early hours of the 14th. January 2021, during the Kovinje and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife and the knife.
The jury was said to be Mr. Perks, a consulting surgeon provided evidence in the disciplinary proceedings against the stream, who faced potential, which potentially losing its job Notting at the University Hospital NHS trust.
When opening the case of the Prosecution Tracy Ayling KC, he said that “clear that the defendant hated Graeme Perks” and wanted him “out of the way.”
Mr. Perks, who was 65 years old, passed the moon before the attack, but suffered “extremely dangerous” injuries to his liver, intestines and pancreas, and received a 95% chance for death, the court was said.
The victim woke up when Brooks broke through his conservatory and descended where his feet “felt a little wet” from gasoline before he felt a “blow into his body,” the jury heard.
The court was said that Brooks threw and gasoline on stations staircase while the wife of the Lord and the youngest son slept upstairs.
The accused fell asleep on the garden late later that morning when they took him to the hospital for injuries into his hands and was arrested.
His hunger strike could not be reported during the trial and the jury said they did not speculate about his absence from the dock.
He appeared in court via video connection for the first time in the HMP Norwich trial, in the absence of Jury, and said Mr. Justice, he wanted to defend himself, that there was no “sufficient time to prepare” for the trial and wanted a four-week break.
Brooks, who could be seen lying on the floor during his court, because he was sitting in a wheelchair, he made him “feel gently,” I’d rather: “I’d rather be dead, so I continued with my striking hunger. I had enough strike.
“I don’t want to die in particular, but if my choice between prisons and death I would rather be dead from closed.”
Brooks, earlier from Landseer Road, Southwell, said his autism could have done more likely to have taken a hunger strike and added that someone in the hospital said “may suffer from anorexia.”
MS Ayling responded to Brooks submissions and said that “manipulates the court process” and that the court “bent backwards” to maintain their right to trial.
The judge agreed to cross the trial for 48 hours for Brooks to give evidence, but he was upset and said “not good enough” to do so in a short time.
The Court heard that he “asked him to return to his cell” and refuses to participate in the proceedings.
Mr. Justice Pepperall ruled that “not less than eight occasions” of 2021. Brooks did not “use strikes hunger or threat some other self-affection to achieve some advantage”.
Brook’s beliefs follow a four-year series of legal hearings, including the wrong trial and seven more interrogated trials.
He stretched numerous possible defense, including self-defense and lack of intent, but never gave evidence directly to the jury.
His first trial, in July 2022, had to be postponed because he suffered from medical complications of radiotherapy, which needed operation.
The judge thanked the jurors in their service in “especially unusual circumstances” and reported them from the jury service for five years.
Maletel Shehmar, Medical Director of Hospitals for Universities Nottingham NHS Trust, said: “We followed Mr. Brook’s case closely and respect the decision on the Court today.
“We would like to offer our compassions to those affected by Mr. Brooks, including Mr. Perke and his family and other colleagues from trust.”