First known lawsuit against the president Donald TrumpTariffs They filed a new civilian alliance for Freedoms in the name of a Florida Correspondents of a business entrepreneur who claims that the president “illegally” overdo his authority to impose integers.
Impact on Lifestyle and Simplified Accessories for Accessories for Business Founder Emily Ley submitted a federal lawsuit In Pensacoli, Florida against Trump and his administration on Thursday.
“These illegally implemented tariffs inflict damage to American companies, US business and US consumers, and will be the end of the many American dreams,” Ley Ua said Post on social networks Day after Trump announced a series of steeper tariffs on the peoples around the words Sent to global stock exchange.
The suit specifically the goal of the Trump Tariff for 20 percent on the goods from China imposed on the beginning of last month. Ley’s small Florida-based companies buy products from China for sale, including planners.
The lawsuit causes the Trump’s use of the International Effects on the 1977 Emergency Economics. (IEPA), for which extensive investigation requires before sanctions can be imposed. Trump used the opioid trade from China as a reason for “emergency” tariffs against the country.
The lawsuit claims that Trump did not show that his actions “needed” or adapted to emergency drug trafficking. In fact, lawyers note, Trump said that the real reason for the tariff reduction in the trade deficit.
In any case, IEEPA enables the freezing of property, trade embarasses and similar sanctions, but not tariffs, claims claims.
The law “authorizes the Presidents to order sanctions as a rapid response to international emergencies. It does not allow the President to impose the tariffs of the American people only when the approvals are Congress,” States.
“Congress passed IEPA to oppose external emergencies, not to give the presidents of the blank waiting for the writing of domestic economic politics,” said.
“In IEEEK’s almost 50-year history, no previous president used that for impetable tariffs, because the Statute does not mention the tariffs, nor do they say anything else suggested to the Presidents on US Citizens’ Tax.”
The suit asks the judge to declare Trump Chinese tariffs illegal and block their implementation.
The president’s allies claimed that small and local companies should use American production for their products, which Ley claimed that her company had already tried.
“We voted at home production from the beginning,” the entrepreneur said in an Instagram Post. “Our first planners are made in the US in 2012. years. Each unit cost $ 38 to do. Now they are not / still do not have infrastructure to support what we do.”
The lawsuit notes that the tariffs will take away the funds that could be used for salaries, financing growth and pour in communities. ” These funds will now force small businesses instead such as simplified prices or reduce staff, legal state for the application.
Trump initially imposed a 10 percent tariff on Chinese goods in the executive 1. February and then doubled to another order 3. March.
He stepped in the total tariff of 54 percent on Wednesday.
Beijing attacked Trump on Friday and imposed a tariff over 8 percent on all American products sold in China.
The White House could not come immediately for a commentary for a lawsuit.