The NCAA The rule that stopped negotiating potentially lucrative names, pictures and similarities before enrolling at the Faculty, General Tennessee Jonathan Skrmeti said on Monday as he announced a settlement in lawsuit over politics.
Skrmeti and a handful of lawyers were generally sued by the NCAA through its name, painting and painting the ban, claiming that the rule violated antitrust laws.
The proposed settlement must still approve the Federal Judge.
In the statement, the screams said “with a more billion entertainment industry that increases from the foundations of faculty sports, children who do not all need to be the only people who denied the opportunity to progress.”
The NCAA spokesman said that the proposed settlement “underline our athletes who benefit from their NIL and our commitment to gain an increased benefit to students-athletes in their college sport.”
The Agreement, if approved by the Court, will enable college for negotiating a compensation for the name, paintings and similarities before enrolling in a particular school, and will enable third parties to negotiate employment windows.
The NCAA will also need to publish any proposed name, paintings and similarities in the next five years and meet the countries before the proposals may enter into force.
General Lawyers in New York, Virginia, Florida and County Columbia were part of the coalition that sued politics.
The judge dealing with the case was previously ordered by the NCA to temporarily stop the policy as the case played.