The restoration was designed to strengthen Keir Starmer’s presidency after failing estimates, a scandal over transport actuaries and concerns about the economy.
The the prime minister had a speech set off new miles – his government’s missions are meat with targets on waiting lists by reducing the NHS, in the name of bobbies on pulses and getting living standards.
All public targets are intended for those who desperately want to see material improvements in their lives after the promised “change” by the 14-year-old Conservatives in the July elections.
But alongside the targets, Starmer also gave the clear impression that he thinks one of the key problems is the change process rather than the policy; career from the civil service.
As the Institute for Government later put it: “Usually for such a public address, Starmer returned again and again to internal issues of processes and delivery. As well as trying to raise the scale of the government’s ambition, the public sector – and especially the civil service – was being shaken.
Labor councilors and politicians have been complaining for months that they don’t know how difficult it is to bring about change in the country. It has become common to refrain that “Jacob Rees-Mogg has a point on certain things” or “Dominic Cummings was right”.
Before coming into government, Starmer and his team seemed to have little interest in reorganizing Whitehall beyond the idea of ”missionary boards” to preside over change. But that is now clearly much more on the table, as no one is looking for 10 ways through reforms. One senior government source said a number of options were being considered, including a no-10 package and a slimmed-down cabinet office, with the overall number of civil servants “having to come down”.
Simon Case, the outgoing cabinet secretary who, as Boris Johnson appointed, was unpopular with the new administration, could clearly see which way the wind was blowing when he gave his valedictory lecture earlier this week. He gave eight examples of “shining lights” in the civil service that exemplified best practice, but also a reason to move with the times and the necessary reform.
“Looking forward to the future, what I am most afraid of is complacency and regret to recognize that our unique constitutional position is re-deserving that our continued existence is based on change as a continuum,” he told the audience, at least. the first three boxes from the library.
“It is likely to be quite amicable with the corresponding external factors … Development, the objective in development is essential. The civil service should be considered as an earlier part of the integral journey than through the rear mirror”.
Starmer, a former civil servant himself as ex-director of public prosecutions, entered the office not wanting to revise the British republic, but now exactly what the secretary of the new cabinet ordered; Christopher Wormaldto do, with to do “Starmer said he was unpopular to get things done, and that’s what he’s doing,” one Labor MP supporter said. “What must be said must be said.”
Post Newsletter promotion
While Elon Musk threatened to take on the bureaucracy in Donald Trump’s US, and Nigel Farage is likely to adopt similar rhetoric in the UK as he prepares to take on the role of incumbent in May’s local elections in England, Starmer is also consciously moving to pre-empt criticism of the government’s laziness.
But one of the prime ministers’ problems is that they are too public to bathe the civil service in a way that is unlikely to achieve the best results. “He could say he needs us more, but in a way that doesn’t hurt his feelings,” said one Whitehall insider. “This is really damaging. We expect it from the Tories, but it’s a blow.”
Elder of labor The prime minister’s sources said that the remarks were made not only on civil servants but on his entire administration. “He was making a point around Whitehall, missing middle management for 14 years because of all the cutting and changing; said he, “a short time ends with sticking poultices.” The prime minister had the end of a televised recording on Friday, to make it appear that he really appreciates the work of civil servants, as he emphasizes that “through this reform we intend to drive so that we can deliver better for the country.”.
That was easier said than done. Numerous blueprints have been put forward to reform the civil service – most recently by David Cameron’s enforcement minister for change in Whitehall, Francis Maude. And many prime ministers ultimately shy away from the options for radical change – from increased political involvement in electing top civil servants to the bulk of No 10 – often concluding that a big battle over Whitehall reform will not translate into a big reward from the electorate.
But Starmer seems to have an appetite for competition and to transform public opinion regarding aid missions.